Published: 2025-12-05
Last Updated: 2025-12-05
You are here: /blog/religious-governance
People in nearly every nation have some type of freedom of religion. This means that governments are no longer able to impose religious context or requirements for rent, food, and utilities or for socialization activities. All humans are naturally drawn to socialization, its part of our gene expression. However, humans chose to socialize in different activities and most aren't religious based anymore.
What this means for the government worker is that when it comes to religion, they have to keep it to themselves. The people usually aren't paying them to market their personal religion. As a government worker, they must also weigh government interests against their own personal belief system. Perhaps, working as a religious worker might be a better job choice for some workers.
There are two countries on Earth that are not part of the U.N. General Assembly. Vatican City which has a military force of 35 soldiers. They often request assistance or assessment from the Roman Curia. There is also Palestine who do not consider themselves part of the U.N. and have lodged compaints resulting in 46 condemnations against Israel for Humanitarian reasons as of 2016. While Palestine lodged the complaint, the U.N. decided that Israel was in eggregious violations of the vision and values of the U.N. and the conditions of membership.
There are a few countries that have a religious document as part of their constitutions. These are Israel and several countries in Saudi Arabia. They have each given presentations at the U.N. and explained the following conclusions.
Those religious documents are old, for example the Torah is estimated to be at least 6,000 years old by amateur archeologists and information researchers. The Quran is at least 1400 years old. Human behaviors are often propogated over 200 to 300 years, and if the context of criminality is antiauthoritarianism against the majority vote, the majority in these countries have voted to continue with the same behaviors that have been part of their gene pool for over 200-300 years.
This presents a context with UDHR Article 18. While the gene pool expressions are very religious oriented, the government does not directly oblige people to participate in religion. It is an available social activity and the documents are part of their constitution. However, the gene pool expression also finds certain behaviors stigmatic and antagonistic. The government must weigh justice of gene pool expression, religious freedom, rights of an accused party, and their own safety with modern nation governance requirements. Overall, there is an effort to amend laws, without upsetting the people so that the laws are non religiously worded and so the people can live righteously in their home without stigma or prejudice from their religious communities.
In other words, the laws must still representative of the majority gene expression and codes of conduct. They shall omit, religious sources of those conduct and request that the people limit enforcement of gene expression requirements when the cause of such expression is strictly religious. The people will comply with less severe requirements such as socialization with outside parties but will reserve their right to prosecution under religious context for more eggregious violations of gene expression.
This is not the context of governance outside of those areas.
In most areas, laws are religiously neutral and set based on the will of the monarch, the will of the people, or a compromise in governance.