Published: 2025-12-16
Last Updated: 2025-12-16
You are here: /blog/problematic-gene-expression
People behave and act differently throughout the world, there's an old behavior analysis that says "what people do in one area, might not be what people do in a different area". It was mind boggling, and perpendicularly complex to analyze that type of thought expression. An epiphany, if you will.
Statistically, people living within a few square miles of each other will have different gene expressions, even people that are closely biologically related may not fit in with the same social groups. This can create problems with human aggression when someone that does not fit in with a certain social group keeps antagonizing the group for social interaction. It can lead to a violent situation and is an unwanted gene expression in many parts of the world.
The behavior is so undesirable that there are laws, court procedure, and commonly acceptable reactions to this type of antagonizing behavior. Attempting to interact without consent from the troubled party. Most western cultures call this harassment and its viewed as petty offense, but it can result in a situation where the courts will agree the instigator is at fault in a situation that resulted in a geographical area because of harassment.
This does not mean people being troubled by harassment, although it can, it refers to gene expressions that are the most problematic to other groups.
Police Expression
Many police are successful throughout the world because they follow policy, understand the court procedure, and don't bother people that are not engaged in criminal activity. In fact, they are very respectful to people that are not involved in criminal activity because their life can end up quite miserable if they harass people that don't understand the context of going to jail. Mostly because they ask questions about new behaviors and their correlation to legality, court procedure, fines or legal expenses related to the behavior.
Problematic gene expression in police groups resembles what is viewed as 4th amendment violations in the U.S. The police are investigating things just to be nosy or out of their own curiosity instead of in pursuance of a police report that is in compliance with court procedure. This can lead to the police engaging in behaviors such as invasion of privacy, theft, extortion, and gene pool manipulation. The behaviors are viewed as problematic because it can result in a high probability of the policy engaging in conflict with the population. The population then turns to the remaining government to give account of their behaviors.
Human population groups are rarely without police. Its thought to be part of a human thought algorithm to have them nearby. However, they expect compliance with policy and procedure, and to be aware of the laws and follow them accordingly.
Low Volume Economists
People need a certain volume of available resources to be healthy. While this may be viewed as excessive to some, the story of the elephant and the mice often comes to mind. An elephants dinner may be able to feed a field full of mice, but if the elephant has to go without their own dinner for very long, they would much rather step on the mice. A lot of elephants wouldn't go through that much effort to accommodate the mice either. One or two free meals would be more than enough unless they became good friends, then maybe a few times a year would be adequate to maintain the friendship. Low volume economists are normally responsible for the elephants stepping on every mice they see, and for mice following elephants around making sure they don't eat at all.
Moderate volume takes into account the needs of all the animals in an area, their may be times of "not enough" and times of "way too much" but overall, it works out throughout the seasons and over very many years. This is viewed as the minimum amount of resources for an area to be healthy. It doesn't have to thrive and it doesn't have to anguish. Things are surviving, and they are not suffering.
Amateur Geneticists
This is one of the biggest causes of non-consensual sexual interaction. It can lead to unlawful transfer of resources, unwanted children, and a large populations of people that are disabled and dependent on the government. Gene expression has been studied since before the modern era. It has been at least 5,000 years that medicines, biology, composition, and demolecularization have been studies. In the 1500s doctors allowed the general population to start selecting their own mates based on their studies in molecular biology and gene expression. If people are too dissimilar, their children will likely be disabled, rejected, or abandoned. If the government is too intrusive on a new gene pool, they will likely also be abandoned as dependent on the government that inquires too much about their existence and their necessary resources. This ends up leaving the government in a predicament, and the usually select to comply with their requirements through under resourced environments.
The amateur geneticist and overly curious community have been responsible for the elimination of large sets of human gene pool over several hundred years. This results in a modern quest for biodiversity, which is often met with objections due to the amateur geneticists.
Voyeurism
Any type of behavior that is non-consensual and repetitive is often classified as an aggression trait. Watching other people being intimate is often described as intimidating and nauseating by the people being watched. This can reduce fertility in women and onset intimacy dysfunction in males.
This aggressive behavior has been described as the cause for electing celibacy and non propagation of genes by many people moving to new areas and deciding not to breed. It is so prevalent in some places that those areas are described as detention and incarceration for those with undesirable gene traits.
The people being watched often describe that the reason they did not have children was because they were meant to feel they were being punished when they attempted to be intimate. This then caused them to come to the conclusion that they are not to be intimate with anyone in that area.
These interviews are often conducted after a person has passed the recommended maximum age for healthy breeding.
In a normal context voyeurism is a playful activity between consenting adults and people non-consenting or without an agreement are viewed as victims of aggression.
Contrasting Behavior Interactions
These can result in brain damage, large areas of conflict, and isolation as the predominant gene expression. Time limits throughout the day, year, and lifespan prevent people from participating in every conceivable activity on Earth. People are often encouraged to try contrasting activities when dealing with boredom. Maybe a sedentary activity might be less boring than sports, if the person has been doing that for a very long time and no longer finds interest in it. Its also encouraged when people are absorbed in a certain activity or culture that might be a point of contention with another group. They are not required to engage, interact, or communicate with them on a constant basis or to have persistent communications with them. The goal is often to discuss differences in the contentious behavior, and to discover if there needs to be more room placed between the two groups.
Forcing people to interact in an activity or to participate with a group simply because its a contrast to their normal gene expression is viewed as abusive. It can result in the person feeling like they are under detention, often without cause, process, or explanation about what they did wrong. Being overenthusiastic about an activity is often not a good reason to force someone to participate in a contrasting activity. Overenthusiasm may be part of their personality and normal gene expression and if the activity is not illegal, there is little reason to assess them for behavior modification and have them complete a treatment plan.
Unwanted Religious Participation
While many countries have freedom to participate in any selected religion that shows acceptance of the person desiring participation. Very few countries require someone to participate in a specific religion or in a random religion they have not heard about, don't agree with, or do not have time on their schedule for. Even if people agree, have time, and are aware of a specific religion, they may not want to participate for other reasons. Such as, it is not required of them to participate.
Forced religious participation most often happens with amateur geneticists because they misunderstand many concepts. Religion is not necessarily a gene expression, it is an activity that is available in an area. In some areas, these activities are popular because they allow socialization and making friends. Once people have socialized and made friends, they are not necessarily required to continue going to religious service throughout their life even if they participate regularly or occasionally.
Forced Gene Pool Interaction
Anything that is non-consensual is viewed as aggressive. This includes forced interaction with gene pools. Whether its for diversity or for studying similarities. The results will often be skewed when forced participation is taking place. These behaviors can include forcing people to interact with parents, siblings, children, aunts, or uncles. It can also include forcing people to leave their family to interact with a different gene pool aggressively and non-consensually.
Gene pool interaction happens consensually and most people are aware of which questions to ask and how their family feels about certain situations. In the modern world, the individual is the person most often making consensual decision about their own environment and who they want to interact with. Anything beyond this should be posed as a question, opportunity, activity presentation, or invite. There should be absolutely no resentment in being declined for an inquiry. Most people will respond politely with little or no detail. It is normal, for a no to be issued with a limited amount explanation
People with children do not want to leave their offspring in a world that is violent, aggressive, non-consensual, and with limited resources. The world has improved a lot over the past 30 years and has become more abundant with resources as humans have learned to limit their overconsumption. However, policy makers feel that more needs to be done to minimize aggressive behaviors and non consensual interactions with other humans. As the world has become more demilitarized, policy has shifted to eliminating antagonizing gene pools. This will have an interesting effect on contentious behavior and the perceptions of others who are in contrast to ones own existence.