Published: 2025-11-05
Last Updated: 2025-11-05
You are here: /blog/onsetting-leach-behaviors
Humans developed in groups and even humans that are more solitary or independent live in a group environment. They just don't expect to have to keep in contact with people as a government policy.
Relationships are normally mutually consenstual throughout the world. In the past, close relatives were required to provide for less fortunate members of their gene group or pool. More recently, the government will print money so that different gene pools can flourish equally. However, the stipulation is not to bother, harass, instigate, antogonize, or intimidate other gene groups. Even then, the government will print some money but may mistreat those that achieve satisfaction by harassing other humans. In other words, their pursuit of happiness is solely to make others miserable.
In most countries, if all humans have their rent, food, and utilities paid, the purpose of humans is to seek their own happiness.
The only relationships that can be somewhat encouraged by government are those bound by agreement. There is an implied level of consent in entering into the agreement in the first place, leaving the agreement may have a stipulation or penalty, and that may be negligible to someone that is not interested in the relationship. While the government can often mediate disagreements that were entered into consensually, it rarely - hardly ever, can force non-consenting adults to enter into an agreement. This is especially true the longer the length of the agreement.
A leach is a person who obtains resources from a non-consenting person who is not a worker or administrator of a public resource.
We often learn about agreements in high school job search. The job developer may be asking a few questions to large groups of kids in an auditorium, and they fill out a small slip of paper. They may also be asking the same questions to small groups that provide their student number and a small comment on a form the job developer is filling out for each person.
Once people are in their 20s and 30s, their cost of living, transportation costs, entertainment budgets, and food costs are part of economic models. These can change dynamically and fluidly. They don't require that people line up with the job developer everytime they switch jobs or for the employers to notify them that they no longer have any workers.
For some people, inclusion in economic models can begin at 16-20. For example, they can graduate high school early and work full time or they can graduate early and attend online college from high school to spend time with their friends.
Considering that time is a resource, most people wouldn't expect that they would somehow be obligated to allocate part of their time to someones job training or educational expenses without a formal notice or request that would be examined under the rules of agreements. If they didn't agree to be a teacher or a job developer, it doesn't make sense they would be obligated. It doesn't seem that is part of any agreement for someone that isn't specifically designated with informed consent to do so. They normally do so as part of their job and put out a formal request if they need help with something they don't know how to do or that someone else may specialize in.
Most people do need help from other people, but there are large agreements that are part of social behaviors. Some people call these social contracts. For example, a parent has an agreement that their kids can go to public school for a certain amount of time, that they can be home schooled, or that they can attend online school. Private school is an alternative that both meets public school requirements, and most often has additional curriculum. They are allowed to omit parts of the public school curriculum that may be in conflict with their curriculum. This can be welfare models in a business school or sexual education in a religious school, it may be nurition or dietary models in other schools, and it can include exercise for those not entering professional athletics programs.
Both teenagers and adults have agreements that there will be enough resources in the area for them to flourish. This doesn't necessarily mean to live lavishly or luxuriously, but it doesn mean that they wont be deprived of necessities for their own basic development. In most countries, this means the government is required to keep the level of human development for a gene group at the same level or better as their parents and grand parents. Realistically, this means jobs cover the cost of modest entertainment even for a low skilled worker or someone on welfare and that jobs for higher skilled workers aren't having all their money allocated to rent, food, utilities, and taxation programs.
This leaves a lot of rooms for mutually consensual accommodations. Someone may be willing to allocate part of their time resources to help people learn something from school or to complete their job training, or to write a letter asking that part or all of their job description be modified so that it is more humane for their person. Areas with this type of consent program for people in need have a much higher level of participation in the development of those with additional human necessities.
Types of Leaches
bio leaches - people think that because they are part of the same gene pool, they deserve everything anyone else gets in their gene pool. They may not know how to do any of the tasks or use any of the equipment. They may have evolved differently and have difficulty with some of the perceptions and sensory signals required for a job, task, or hobby.
economic leaches - these people often feel that because they live in a certain area, they deserve the same income, credit scores, financial products, housing, and transportation as other people that live in the area. Realistically, they may all have different economic requirements and while some statistics are open, they aren't necessarily representative of what a person will obtain if they move to the area. This can include behaviors like following people aroud to see where they get all their money. They may end up posing risk to people in certain economies.
socialization leaches - relationships are consensual and even inclusive groups have their limits on interacting with certain expressions. Expecting that social groups request the presence of a person or that of others, they've never been seen interacting with is unreasonable and absurd to most people. Asking that they follow the social rules of another group they don't interact with is also viewed as unreasonable. Most people introduce themselves to an open and inclusive group and ask what the rules are or how they can participate. With regulators, they are usually looking for compatibility, not necessarily to change behaviors or demand more inclusiveness.
internet leaches - most websites are run by an individual or group that is part of a larger context. There are agreements on the internet that aren't necessarily governed by Silicon Valley. Most internet agreements are between the website and domain owner, the ISP, and the hosting company. The content on a website might be under separate agreement with one or more people or groups. These people are normally in violation of agreements and have no context of how the internet works after 2015, they've never reached out to an internet group and dont have any credentials for internet infrastructure or creative works. They often take other peoples content and repost it or remix it without knowing if they actually allow that with their works.
housing leaches - most places are segregated by behaviors. Its not an exact science but is pretty accurate and still allows for lots of diversity. Its rare that people living near each other will fight or steal from each other. Some places are really quiet all the time, other places have a fair amount of noise throughout the entire day and night. In some places people work all the time, and in others, nearly everyone sets their own schedule. People know when they move into a new area if they feel comfortable there or not. Participating in both economic and socialization leaching when moving to a new area can be viewed as housing leaching.