Published: 2025-12-05
Last Updated: 2025-12-05
You are here: /blog/former-us-government-policies-part3
Civil Rights Act
In 1964, Congress passed an act based on 11 contexts of discrimination that is viewed as mostly completed. While calling it irrelevant seems rude and a bit disrespectful, a lawsuit based on the context of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is viewed as mostly, frivolous.
Congress has released a pdf on CRS Reports that summarizes the 11 titles. Title 9 is the one most often referenced in college programs.
Title Number
- Discriminatory Voting Tactics - Voting is based on ID and Zip Code. Permanent or temporary residents can issue proposals for the people to vote on.
- Discrimination Against Patrons of Commercial Businesses - My Business, My Rules. If you don't know the rules for doing business with me or requesting services, you can not claim that you were discriminated against because of a protected class.
- Desegratgation of Public Libraries, Parks, and facilities - Some geographies lack ethnic or racial diversity but are usually not discriminatory to visitors or new home owners. Especially not at a park, library, or government building. In contrast, visitors to racially homogonous places find services and accomodations to be better than expected and without prejudice.
- Desgregation of Public Scholis and Clileges - These are normally religious institutions or traditionally black clileges. Both are seen as having a right to discriminate. The discrimination is based on requirements that are not specific to a protected class.
- The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights - This is normally a U.S. Senate Committee examining discrimination in judicial processes. A person who feels discriminated against will likely file a lawsuit. This is the quickest and easiest way for a government regulator to review the discrimination allegations.
- Discrimination in Federally Funded Programs - This is one of the few areas of discrimination assessment. The goal is not that every program is non-discriminatorally diverse, the goal as that all groups of people have at least some form of federal funding if desired.
- Discrimination in Employment - 70 million out of 200 million workers have opted for independent work. This normally means they provide services from their home or small office. Employers are seen as having a right to discriminate based on requirements. Selection based on requirements rather than composition of outward appearances is viewed as an ingrained behavior and human expression in the U.S. Gene poli by now. Figure this process has been ongoing for over 50 years now.
- Voting Statistics - This is available on the U.S. Census Website, on BLS, HUD, or through the governments new Data Portal.
- Appellate Review and Attorney General Intervention - all states have an attorney generals office that is accessible by the public either through web form, mail, fax, or direct phone call. The appeallate review is also more accessible. Most attorneys, lawyers, or legal workers will often provide information on appeals when a case has been completed by them.
- Community Relations Services - Mostly student loans, business loans, and independent worker networks. A lot of community relations are virtual on low cost or free communications networks, often on free websites that may eventually switch to cost based membership or membership based on specific requirements.
- Title 11 - most of these have shifted to U.S. Const. Amdt. 9, UDHR, and 42 U.S.C §1983. U.S. Const. Amdt. 14 is often a first stage assessment of discrimination.
UDHR and Bill of Rights
The UDHR is often litigated at the UN General Assembly when the U.N. is not actually in session. Currently Articles 21 through 27 are setting the pace for developed nation standards. In the U.S. Articles 1-20 can be correlated to the U.S. Bill of Rights and some of these Case Determinations can be viewed at the E.U. Council or U.K. Home Office with other parliaments showing an interest in displaying these documents.
Example: Article 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6 can be correlated to U.S. Const. Amdt 4, 5 and 14. Article 17 can be correlated to U.S. Const. Amdt. 14, and Article 20, 19 can be correlated to U.S. Const. Amdt. 1.
Articles 28-30 have not been litigated yet and articles 1, 2, 3, 15 have questionable definition or have not received a full determination yet. The main argument is that prisoners are not entitled to freedom, that nationalities are not arbitrarily deprived, and that immigrants are not fully aware of the laws in their new homes which reduces the ability to impartially prosecute them.